PsychBytes

A publication of the Washington Baltimore Center for Psychoanalysis

Share This Post

Thinking About Culture and Aggression

Margarita Cereijido, PhD
Member, Washington Center for Psychoanalysis
April 2021 (Re-issue from October 2014) | Volume 7 | Issue 9

Conflict is a pervasive phenomenon charged with emotions driven by difference in cultural perspectives. That applies to conflicts ranging from wars between countries to small “misunderstandings” between individuals.

Cultural difference tends to provoke mistrust and aggressive feelings. That is in part because differing ways of interpreting reality call our own truth into question, and therefore, make us anxious. We are all immersed in micro-cultures (religious culture, socio-economic culture, family culture, national culture…) which color our conception of reality.

From a psychoanalytic perspective, according to Freud (The Project, 1895), perceiving the other as bad is a universal and normal part of developing a cohesive sense of self. The individual can locate in the other that which is perceived as unwanted and dangerous within his/her self, thereby making the external person into something foreign and evil. Just as we maintain a cohesive sense of self by locating our own unacceptable aspects in the different other, so too we can love one another as a group as long as there are outsiders we can hate. Freud(Civilization and its Discontents, 1930a) maintains that individuals use small differences to support their sense of superiority to the other. This process on an individual level becomes prejudice at a societal level.

As analytic therapists we try to understand what is unique to each individual while trying to avoid imposing assumptions based in our own culture. Most cultural information is unconscious, with neither the patient nor the therapist fully aware of its meaning and impact. As the work progresses, ideally cultural information becomes conscious and available for understanding.

While the therapist is always a “stranger” in his patient’s internal world, offering a different perspective from where to understand reality, this becomes even more true when therapist and patient belong to different “cultures.”

Explore more in PsychBytes

The Reality Principle

When I was in graduate school studying child development, a friend and I would go to a local playground and watch the adult caregivers and children. Inevitably, it would be time to go. Often enough, the child would want to stay: tough stuff! I imagine the following: the parent says, “We have to go so I can cook dinner before Mommy comes home.” And we all remember the child’s response, “But I don’t want to!”  Dialogue is met with screaming, yet the crying protests fail. Then the horror: The larger person would pick up the smaller and carry it away. The smaller, we remember, might feel like “an it”, a thing, not an autonomous person. Our will, the child’s will, was met with what Sigmund Freud called the reality principle. Many of us adults today are equally frustrated by the reality principle as we are carried off to places we do not want to go. The world is taking many of us down a road…

The Eloquence of Silent Dreams

Although psychoanalysis is based on “putting it into words,” most dreams, Freud’s “royal road to the unconscious,” lack spoken words. Researchers believe such dreams are silent because they tap pre-verbal experience, enabling them to achieve a profound ambiguity. The specificity of words can narrow that potential…

Content Edit Request

Content Edit Request

Please submit one request at a time.