PsychBytes

A publication of the Washington Baltimore Center for Psychoanalysis

Share This Post

Change at a Cost

Robert Gerlits, MSW
Member, Washington Baltimore Center for Psychoanalysis
May 2021 | Volume 7 | Issue 10

I recently recalled a moment in my personal analysis in which I discovered that an issue I had brought up many months prior was gone. I didn’t recall steadfastly working on it or even thinking about it but I recognized the undesirable behavior was a thing of the past. I was joyful. It was a significant change and it felt like it was achieved without labor or suffering. Effortlessly, I had apparently put the behavior in the rear-view mirror and added distance.

Surprisingly, the joy I felt was interrupted by sadness. It turns out the behavior was a valuable interpersonal tool in my insulated and isolated family of origin. Now, as an adult exposed to a broad swath of people, cultures and races the “successful behavior” of my youth was untrustworthy. While I hadn’t consciously given up the behavior, I also hadn’t tossed it in the dustbin; I had incrementally moved it to a lower place in my arsenal of interpersonal tools. In fact, it continues to show up when spending time with my family of origin or in groups reminiscent of my family.

When I responded to the “random” urge to write the draft of this piece, it was effortless and satisfying. Later, on the cusp of retiring as a psychoanalyst, I realized that this urge was not random at all. It was a response to an unconscious recognition that my desired behavior change (retirement) came with a cost — the loss of my career, my identity and most of all my rewarding work with patients.

Explore more in PsychBytes

The Reality Principle

When I was in graduate school studying child development, a friend and I would go to a local playground and watch the adult caregivers and children. Inevitably, it would be time to go. Often enough, the child would want to stay: tough stuff! I imagine the following: the parent says, “We have to go so I can cook dinner before Mommy comes home.” And we all remember the child’s response, “But I don’t want to!”  Dialogue is met with screaming, yet the crying protests fail. Then the horror: The larger person would pick up the smaller and carry it away. The smaller, we remember, might feel like “an it”, a thing, not an autonomous person. Our will, the child’s will, was met with what Sigmund Freud called the reality principle. Many of us adults today are equally frustrated by the reality principle as we are carried off to places we do not want to go. The world is taking many of us down a road…

The Eloquence of Silent Dreams

Although psychoanalysis is based on “putting it into words,” most dreams, Freud’s “royal road to the unconscious,” lack spoken words. Researchers believe such dreams are silent because they tap pre-verbal experience, enabling them to achieve a profound ambiguity. The specificity of words can narrow that potential…

Content Edit Request

Content Edit Request

Please submit one request at a time.