PsychBytes

A publication of the Washington Baltimore Center for Psychoanalysis

Share This Post

Siblings: Deep Ties/Tangled Complexities

Deborah Blessing, MSW
Member, The Washington Center for Psychoanalysis
March 2017 | Volume 4 | Issue 3

Siblings play powerful roles in our lives from birth until death. They are our companions, competitors, defenders and the ones who taunt us. They can land a blow or lend a hand. Such experiences may be forgotten in an instant or register deeply. When development goes well enough–when we are loved in spite of how murderously hateful we can be–our sibling relationships help us learn about and tolerate our own and their dark sides, potentially softening the harsh sense of guilt common in young children. Kids can show intense aggression toward sibs more readily than toward parents, on whom they are fully dependent and with whom potential loss of love or retaliation is terrifying.

Rivalries and triumphs, fears of displacements and exclusion, which plague us throughout life take form within siblings relationships—fought out in our minds as well as in external reality. Jockeying for position and the ubiquitous attending to who is getting what from whom are ordinary, but difficult parts of growing up—they facilitate development as well as being

troublesome. How we get on with sibs influences how we sort out experiences with friends or professional groups.

When sib experiences are negotiated well enough, as adults we can be friends and enjoy a shared history and sense of continuity over time. Whether positive or negative, sibling relationships help shape our minds, lend texture to our personalities, and impact how we experience ourselves in the world while teaching us how to be one among others. They are great contributors to our development, even if not well conceptualized in our psychoanalytic theories.

Explore more in PsychBytes

The Reality Principle

When I was in graduate school studying child development, a friend and I would go to a local playground and watch the adult caregivers and children. Inevitably, it would be time to go. Often enough, the child would want to stay: tough stuff! I imagine the following: the parent says, “We have to go so I can cook dinner before Mommy comes home.” And we all remember the child’s response, “But I don’t want to!”  Dialogue is met with screaming, yet the crying protests fail. Then the horror: The larger person would pick up the smaller and carry it away. The smaller, we remember, might feel like “an it”, a thing, not an autonomous person. Our will, the child’s will, was met with what Sigmund Freud called the reality principle. Many of us adults today are equally frustrated by the reality principle as we are carried off to places we do not want to go. The world is taking many of us down a road…

The Eloquence of Silent Dreams

Although psychoanalysis is based on “putting it into words,” most dreams, Freud’s “royal road to the unconscious,” lack spoken words. Researchers believe such dreams are silent because they tap pre-verbal experience, enabling them to achieve a profound ambiguity. The specificity of words can narrow that potential…

Content Edit Request

Content Edit Request

Please submit one request at a time.