PsychBytes

A publication of the Washington Baltimore Center for Psychoanalysis

Share This Post

Loop of Familiarity

Diksha Lohiya, M.A.
Fellow, WBCP Adult and Child Fellowship Program
December 2025 | Volume 9 | Issue 5

I went out for a walk today. The air was still, heavy with that strange quiet that sits between reflection and loneliness. I thought of him—the person who adds activity to my life but not depth. We run together, try new restaurants, and share banter that fills the silence. He pushes me out of my physical comfort zone, but not my emotional one.

It’s not bad. It’s just thin. Two months in, I already sense the absence of emotional gravity, the tenderness that steadies you. I could do all these things alone, but what I can’t recreate is the illusion of togetherness, the comfort of proximity that mimics connection.

A friend told me recently that maybe I stay longer because these relationships keep me where I am—slightly unsteady, slightly unsure. “He keeps you in your loop,” she said, where sometimes, I do not intend to move ahead myself. Maybe she’s right. Freud might have called it repetition compulsion, the mind’s way of circling back to old wounds, hoping this time, they’ll heal differently. The chaos feels like home because it once was.

He deflects; I analyze. Both of us circling the same thing—intimacy. My defenses are subtle: I think instead of feel, explain instead of express. Our defenses protect us from psychic pain, creating what Winnicott would call  the false self—the adaptive, composed version of me that fits into love while keeping the real one hidden.

Sometimes I imagine leaving. I’ve rehearsed it in my head a hundred times. I picture the silence that will follow, the ache and mostly relief braided together. Yet I stay another day, maybe two. Because what if absence feels worse than this emptiness? The ache of the familiar feels safer than peace.

Explore more in PsychBytes

The Reality Principle

When I was in graduate school studying child development, a friend and I would go to a local playground and watch the adult caregivers and children. Inevitably, it would be time to go. Often enough, the child would want to stay: tough stuff! I imagine the following: the parent says, “We have to go so I can cook dinner before Mommy comes home.” And we all remember the child’s response, “But I don’t want to!”  Dialogue is met with screaming, yet the crying protests fail. Then the horror: The larger person would pick up the smaller and carry it away. The smaller, we remember, might feel like “an it”, a thing, not an autonomous person. Our will, the child’s will, was met with what Sigmund Freud called the reality principle. Many of us adults today are equally frustrated by the reality principle as we are carried off to places we do not want to go. The world is taking many of us down a road…

The Eloquence of Silent Dreams

Although psychoanalysis is based on “putting it into words,” most dreams, Freud’s “royal road to the unconscious,” lack spoken words. Researchers believe such dreams are silent because they tap pre-verbal experience, enabling them to achieve a profound ambiguity. The specificity of words can narrow that potential…

Content Edit Request

Content Edit Request

Please submit one request at a time.