PsychBytes

A publication of the Washington Baltimore Center for Psychoanalysis

Matisse "Dance" (1910) Moscow, The Hermitage Museum

Share This Post

“Pagan” or Sublime?

J. David Miller, MD
Member, Washington Baltimore Center for Psychoanalysis
April 2026 | Volume 9 | Issue 9

When the curtain rises on Brian Friel’s renowned play, “Dancing at Lughnasa,” Michael, a pleasant young man, addresses the audience as though he’s lying on an analyst’s couch: “When I cast my mind back to that summer of 1936, different kinds of memories offer themselves to me.” He was only seven, but the memories still make him “uneasy;” it was a time of “things changing too quickly.” These memories unfold for us on the stage.

In Michael’s Irish village, it is the time of Lughnasa, the Celtic harvest festival, a “pagan” celebration centered on communal dancing. Michael hears that devout Catholics scorn it as a rampage by “savages” from “the black hills.” He sees his mother, Chris, and her four sisters erupt in a pagan-like dance of “near-hysteria” when the radio plays a stirring tune, but when the music stops, they stop suddenly and seem ashamed.

However, as Michael says, it was a time of “things changing.” His missionary uncle, Father Jack, newly returned from Africa, exalts the ecstatic dancing of pagan “ceremonies.” As the love-child of Chris and Gerry, Michael watches his roving father when he comes to visit: “For the first time in my life, I had a chance to observe him.” He sees his parents dancing in tender silence, “as if language had surrendered to movement.” Though no priest had blessed their sexual union, their dance seems to sanctify it. As Friel has said, “there’s a need for the pagan in life…I don’t think of it as disrupting Christianity.”

Friel presents the “pagan,” in ceremonial or romantic dancing, as potentially spiritual, a sublimation of the instinctual. He had no analytic training or treatment, and when asked about Freud, he said only, “I’ve read some,” yet he was able to read himself and the people in his life remarkably well.

Explore more in PsychBytes

The Reality Principle

When I was in graduate school studying child development, a friend and I would go to a local playground and watch the adult caregivers and children. Inevitably, it would be time to go. Often enough, the child would want to stay: tough stuff! I imagine the following: the parent says, “We have to go so I can cook dinner before Mommy comes home.” And we all remember the child’s response, “But I don’t want to!”  Dialogue is met with screaming, yet the crying protests fail. Then the horror: The larger person would pick up the smaller and carry it away. The smaller, we remember, might feel like “an it”, a thing, not an autonomous person. Our will, the child’s will, was met with what Sigmund Freud called the reality principle. Many of us adults today are equally frustrated by the reality principle as we are carried off to places we do not want to go. The world is taking many of us down a road…

The Eloquence of Silent Dreams

Although psychoanalysis is based on “putting it into words,” most dreams, Freud’s “royal road to the unconscious,” lack spoken words. Researchers believe such dreams are silent because they tap pre-verbal experience, enabling them to achieve a profound ambiguity. The specificity of words can narrow that potential…

Content Edit Request

Content Edit Request

Please submit one request at a time.